A React team you can hand a hard problem to
We build web applications, internal tools and progressive web apps in React and TypeScript, working remotely with companies in the US and Europe. AI writes the first draft of every component; a senior engineer reviews it before it reaches your repository. You see running software every week, and the repository is yours from the first commit.
Free quote · no commitment · you own the code and every account
The problem
Fast delivery and code you can live with are usually sold as a trade
Agencies that move quickly tend to leave behind something nobody wants to touch six months later. Teams that build carefully quote timelines you cannot plan a launch around. AI changed the arithmetic of that trade, but only for teams willing to do the unglamorous half: reading every generated file before it lands. That is the half most people skip.
How we work
Four commitments
None of these are novel. What is uncommon is doing all four on a four-week timeline.
React and TypeScript, no exceptions
One stack, deeply known, rather than six we would each be mediocre at. If your project genuinely needs Rails or Django, we will tell you and point you elsewhere.
Weekly demos, not monthly reports
You see running software every week. A status document tells you what someone believes happened; a demo tells you what actually works.
AI drafts it, a senior engineer signs it off
Components, tests and scaffolding come out of AI in hours. Nothing reaches your repository without a human having read it, because the failure mode of generated code is confident and quiet.
Written to be handed over
Typed, commented in plain language, deployable by someone who has never met us. We assume from day one that another team will inherit this.
Scope
What we take on
If your project is not on this list, ask anyway. We will tell you honestly whether we are the right team.
- Web applications and internal tools, front end and API integration
- Progressive web apps your customers install without an app store
- Rescuing or finishing an existing React codebase somebody else started
- Design systems and component libraries your own team will keep using
- Migrations off page builders and no-code tools that stopped scaling
- Static rendering and prerendering, so crawlers and AI assistants can read the app
Process
How an engagement runs
Weekly demos, and a prototype you approve before anyone builds on top of it.
Technical scoping
Two days. We read what exists, list the unknowns, and tell you which parts of your idea are cheap and which are not.
Prototype
One week. Interactive screens and the architecture decision, both approved before anyone builds on top of them.
Iterations
Two to four weeks of build with a demo every week. You change your mind while changing your mind is still cheap.
Handover
Deployment, documentation, accounts transferred, and a walkthrough of the codebase with whoever will own it next.
Honestly
Where we are the wrong choice
We are a small team and we work in one stack. If you need twenty engineers next month, or a native iOS app in Swift, or a data platform, we cannot staff it and pretending otherwise would waste a quarter of your year. We also decline projects where the deadline was set before the scope: those do not end well for anyone, and the person who suffers is usually whoever inherits the code.
FAQ
What people ask before signing
Keep reading
Send us the hard part first
Describe what you are building and what has gone wrong so far. You get back an estimate and a timeline from someone who read the whole thing.
No commitment · we reply within one business day